Ayeda Naqvi on Sufism
 Ayeda Naqvi makes some insightful remarks on Sufism in this article:
So if Nafs al Amarra is our bossy, controlling self and Nafs al Awamma is our unsure, insecure, hesitant self that allows us to be manipulated, what do we aim for? Nafs al Mutmaina. This is the natural self, which is not moved by the addictive compulsion of gratification (Id) or the restraining authoritarianism of self-doubt (Ego). Likened to Freud’s “Super Ego,†the Nafs al Mutamaina is one that already exists within us; it just has to be recognised.
This self is one that has broken free from the shackles of self-doubt as well as of self-righteousness. And as the aspirant evolves towards higher levels of consciousness, he is able to achieve spiritual liberty, the aim of Sufism. Freedom from oppression, both inner and outer, spiritual liberty refers to a state of consciousness in which man is able to recognise and overcome all obstacles that impede his spiritual growth.
Read the full entry here
Subscribe
just read this article and it seemed to me that she was implying that the concepts of Nafs al Amarra, Nafs al Awamma and Nafs al
Mutmaina originated in or are solely associated with sufism. I have known of these concepts for a long time. The source of these concepts
is the holy quran and other Muslims besides Sufis recognize them as well.
Amarra is described in chapter 12 verse 54.
Awamma is described in chapter 75 verse 3.
Mutmaina is described in chapter 89 verses 28-31 and then in chapter 91 verses 10-11.
These verses may also be 12:53, 75: 2. 89: 27 depending on the copy of the quran that you refer to!
Comment by Cubano — November 21, 2007 @ 10:48 am