Comments on: “Globalization in the Time of Poverty” http://www.razarumi.com/2007/02/15/globalization-in-the-time-of-poverty/ In search of the unsearchable: O, my soul! where would you find your house? Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:02:13 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Mayank Austen Soofi http://www.razarumi.com/2007/02/15/globalization-in-the-time-of-poverty/#comment-34 Mayank Austen Soofi Sat, 17 Feb 2007 11:15:25 +0000 http://razarumi.com/2007/02/15/globalization-in-the-time-of-poverty/#comment-34 Like it or not, Globalization is unavoidable. I only hope that apart from influencing and being influenced by each other's popular culture, food, music, fashion, etc. we also make use of this phenomenon to better understand each other and be more tolerant of other cultures, values and life styles. Thank-you Mr. Rumi. Like it or not, Globalization is unavoidable. I only hope that apart from influencing and being influenced by each other’s popular culture, food, music, fashion, etc. we also make use of this phenomenon to better understand each other and be more tolerant of other cultures, values and life styles. Thank-you Mr. Rumi.

]]> By: Raza Rumi http://www.razarumi.com/2007/02/15/globalization-in-the-time-of-poverty/#comment-36 Raza Rumi Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:24:29 +0000 http://razarumi.com/2007/02/15/globalization-in-the-time-of-poverty/#comment-36 Dear Mahi, you have a valid point.. However, it is not about globalization per se.. Given the unequal power structures at the global level, access to global capital and technology is limited and lop-sided. Therefore, it creates further inequality. Also, the symbols of global 'prosperity' are worrying as they relate to one particular brand of progress and advancement.. I agree that the ugly facets of globalization need to be reformed and the process should be steered (and when needed resisted) for more healthy results. Dear Mahi, you have a valid point.. However, it is not about globalization per se.. Given the unequal power structures at the global level, access to global capital and technology is limited and lop-sided. Therefore, it creates further inequality. Also, the symbols of global ‘prosperity’ are worrying as they relate to one particular brand of progress and advancement..
I agree that the ugly facets of globalization need to be reformed and the process should be steered (and when needed resisted) for more healthy results.

]]> By: mahi http://www.razarumi.com/2007/02/15/globalization-in-the-time-of-poverty/#comment-35 mahi Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:54:20 +0000 http://razarumi.com/2007/02/15/globalization-in-the-time-of-poverty/#comment-35 I am fully on the side of the sentiment underlying the opposition to globalization (Gbn) that I see in the posts above: namely, disparity of wealth, and poverty.However, I would like people to think more about the link between the two. I think we should object to and try to reform the ugly sides of globalization - ex: low wages in sweatshops. But how does that indict Gbn itself? If not for Gbn, how is capital/technology going to flow across the borders? (by wars and snatching others wealth as in the past?) Are humans suddenly going to turn into better animals and gift away stuff to their less fortunate brethen? I am fully on the side of the sentiment underlying the opposition to globalization (Gbn) that I see in the posts above: namely, disparity of wealth, and poverty.However, I would like people to think more about the link between the two.

I think we should object to and try to reform the ugly sides of globalization - ex: low wages in sweatshops. But how does that indict Gbn itself? If not for Gbn, how is capital/technology going to flow across the borders? (by wars and snatching others wealth as in the past?) Are humans suddenly going to turn into better animals and gift away stuff to their less fortunate brethen?

]]> By: cubano http://www.razarumi.com/2007/02/15/globalization-in-the-time-of-poverty/#comment-31 cubano Fri, 16 Feb 2007 10:29:07 +0000 http://razarumi.com/2007/02/15/globalization-in-the-time-of-poverty/#comment-31 I couldn't help but smile when looking at the first picture. It captures the reality of our globalized world so well. I am reminded of the following words spoken by Martin Luther King in 1967: "I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin...we must rapidly begin the shift from a thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights, are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered." "A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. With righteous indignation, it will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa, and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say, "This is not just." It will look at our alliance with the landed gentry of South America and say, "This is not just." The Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just." I am not a big advocate of globalization but I have yet to discover any real alternatives to it. I think it's the natural extension of capitalism and if we want to live in a capitalist society then we have to live with globalization as well. I also work for a giant global company so it's ironic for me to speak against globalization because they pay my bills :) I couldn’t help but smile when looking at the first picture. It captures the reality of our globalized world so well. I am reminded of the following words spoken by Martin Luther King in 1967:

“I am convinced that if we are to get on the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values. We must rapidly begin…we must rapidly begin the shift from a thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society. When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights, are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.”

“A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth. With righteous indignation, it will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa, and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say, “This is not just.” It will look at our alliance with the landed gentry of South America and say, “This is not just.” The Western arrogance of feeling that it has everything to teach others and nothing to learn from them is not just.”

I am not a big advocate of globalization but I have yet to discover any real alternatives to it. I think it’s the natural extension of capitalism and if we want to live in a capitalist society then we have to live with globalization as well. I also work for a giant global company so it’s ironic for me to speak against globalization because they pay my bills :)

]]> By: the olive ream http://www.razarumi.com/2007/02/15/globalization-in-the-time-of-poverty/#comment-33 the olive ream Thu, 15 Feb 2007 21:09:22 +0000 http://razarumi.com/2007/02/15/globalization-in-the-time-of-poverty/#comment-33 I cannot accept a concept like Globalization as it is obviously not global when it clearly chooses to ignore majority of the world's (poor/impoverished) population. Perhaps a more apt label would be 'Elitist Privatization'. I am totally against this whole concept of globalization. It is abhorant to say the least. In the guise of promoting free trade and privatization, it creates and encourages the growth of two disperate groups; the struggling poor and the repulsively rich. I cannot accept a concept like Globalization as it is obviously not global when it clearly chooses to ignore majority of the world’s (poor/impoverished) population. Perhaps a more apt label would be ‘Elitist Privatization’.

I am totally against this whole concept of globalization. It is abhorant to say the least. In the guise of promoting free trade and privatization, it creates and encourages the growth of two disperate groups; the struggling poor and the repulsively rich.

]]> By: jeremiasx http://www.razarumi.com/2007/02/15/globalization-in-the-time-of-poverty/#comment-32 jeremiasx Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:10:52 +0000 http://razarumi.com/2007/02/15/globalization-in-the-time-of-poverty/#comment-32 Indeed...I just wonder if the past glories and times of prosperity in these countries throughout history can be blamed on economic imbalances due to global trade practices and finance entities as well or maybe if there is some other culprit at work...it's troubling. Indeed…I just wonder if the past glories and times of prosperity in these countries throughout history can be blamed on economic imbalances due to global trade practices and finance entities as well or maybe if there is some other culprit at work…it’s troubling.

]]>